Shame on You

[[MyIS]Spawndemon]

<img src="http://totalbf2142.com/images/potd/shameonyou.jpg" alt="Shame on You" border="0" />

[Painmaker]

Haha! Thats funny!

[Cryptik]

4/10 not funny

[Micster]

That reminds me, didn't DICE want to give out new custom made ads or something?

[[7IR]581|Pvt.Md2a]

That reminds me, didn't DICE want to give out new custom made ads or something?

Yeah, what happened to that competition?

[darkman671]

hmm...good point...i guess they didnt want to see our ugly drawings and creations...

[D34D1Y]

Nice pic lol and to add nice graphics what vid cards/resolution u run lol.

[Cicchetti]

Rofl.............. 10/10

[tonks950]

Maybe they are still reviewing the huge number of pics submitted.

I don't really think this potd is that great :hmm:

[Hawk00825]

I find it sort of messed up.

[IHateYou]

I don't get it....

[seoulspirit]

me neither:rofl:

[The_Eliminator]

pretty crap tbh.

[Strike1.Tango]

There must have been funnier things to post on a billboard? Or maybe not..

[Vp2008]

i think i seen this on another website before!

yup found the site...

click here! (http://battlefield2.filefront.com/potd/81620)

really shame on you!

[TripCord]

ok this is disturbing. They should have thought about posting this one a little longer.

[St.Sasquatch]

ok this is disturbing. They should have thought about posting this one a little longer.

yeah. agree. i dident really see the humor. i mean, if the funniest thing that was posted was that. then the community aint posting enough.:dead: :shakehead:

[fshy94]

yeah. agree. i dident really see the humor. i mean, if the funniest thing that was posted was that. then the community aint posting enough.:dead: :shakehead:

Agreed. I don't even get the humor. Maybe the guy is in a place for the criminally insane.

[irishdave]

*amused*

[Abominogg]

C'mon, don't you all just act like goody-goody saints! LOL:laugh:
I thinks it's funny in a Monty Python-esque way!

[Conv1ct]

Haha, I'm amused. I mean c'mon not only it is a joke but the main point it is not real.

If there was a joke on the WWII genocide or something, THEN it would not be funny but just sick in the head.

[Annhilator2142]

Hahaha, 8.5/10. Funny thought for a game billboard, in reality it would just be non sence, take taht bd off now or ill have my Scar 11 kill u

It shud have been called through this enemy soldier (EU) off the cliff instead XD

[jake___]

i think i seen this on another website before!

yup found the site...

click here! (http://battlefield2.filefront.com/potd/81620)

really shame on you!

That's pretty low, unless the same person submitted both of them....

Agreed. I don't even get the humor. Maybe the guy is in a place for the criminally insane.

Neither do I. Its not that funny. Even if its a joke that doesn't mean it can have whatever content they want in it.

They could have thought of something a lot funnier if you ask me.

[seoulspirit]

for a second i thought it said bay...

throw a bay off a cliff...HMMMMMM

but a boy...NOOOOOO!

[Anti-:rofl:]!

[SOCOM2142]

Since when does it say stuff like EU Support after you kill someone?

btw graphics are bad. 8/10

[Annhilator2142]

Why didnt they think of an EU soldier? LOL!

for a second i thought it said bay...

throw a bay off a cliff...HMMMMMM

but a boy...NOOOOOO!

[Anti-:rofl:]!


LOL, BAY!

[GIJLowe]

Ummm......... ok? :confused:

[RYKUU]

meh 4/10.

[Sir. Slug]

Err.. I guess it's kinda 'funny'...but really random.. Not even the caption helps it :\

[Sir. bzb]

It takes the piss out of capitalism quite nicely and makes a very valid point about the morality of advertising in games by taking it to a distasteful extreme whilst still keeping the issue of children and adverts at its fore front.

Do try and keep up guys.

[SonicPixel]

Once you have kids of your own, this kind of stuff is just not funny any more... :shakehead:

Makes me want to throw the sickos who think this is funny off a cliff. :salute:

1/10

[Sir. bzb]

Once you have kids of your own, this kind of stuff is just not funny any more... :shakehead:

Makes me want to throw the sickos who think this is funny off a cliff. :salute:

1/10

and what for parents who miss the point completely and would allow corperate morality dictate what there children are exposed to online?

[Annhilator2142]

Uh, i always liked the pictures but whats up with this one?! I agree it is random and it is not bf2142 like, it makes no sense for bf2142.... But at firt i thought it said throw this BAY off the roof, then i started laughing (what is a bay?)...

Once you have kids of your own, this kind of stuff is just not funny any more... :shakehead:

Makes me want to throw the sickos who think this is funny off a cliff. :salute:

1/10

why not 0/10?:confused:

[Conv1ct]

Wait wait... This is photoshopped right?

[nadicus]

Alls I can say is the GFX are bad; textures:cry:; No AA?

It makes no sense; Well maybe to those who enjoy "dead baby jokes." Thats about it.


0.00000/10 because it was also stolen.

[SonicPixel]

and what for parents who miss the point completely and would allow corperate morality dictate what there children are exposed to online?

Just because one has the ability to use words doesn't mean one should use words they don't quite understand... and then to form those very words into cliche phrases which lack substance is, well, remarkable. Good job!

"corperate morality" (sic) is a real knee-slapper.

I don't want to see garbage promoting the tossing of youngsters off a cliff. My toddler children would never see this and just to rain on your parade, I make the decisions about what my children are exposed to.

Why you would care is beyond my comprehension except it gives voice to your morals or lack thereof.

[Sir. bzb]

I make the decisions about what my children are exposed to.


Im always curious how parents choose what ad comes on the TV next and quite where you learn to predict the future more generally is a mystery to me. Why dont you do more to stop murder if you know where and when its going to happen and if in reality you dont have these abilitys accept that more and more parents do not have a say in what children are exposed to.

Tell me exactly what stops an ad in similar taste appearing in game, unless corperate morality exists then nothing prevents such a thing appearing other than someone's willingness to pay.

[SonicPixel]

Mr bzb, you seem to have your own agenda here. I simply stated that once I had children my view of things like this phoney ad changed dramatically and now I see nothing amusing in it. I also stated that I was hostile towards folks promulgating such junk.

You however have challenged my parenting and my intellectual capacity. You also seem determined to shape this into some kind of rant against corporate morality.

Are we then to use personal morality--of which by definition each individual might have their own unique moral code? Or, would the common, accepted and standardized version of a society's moral code (corporate morality) be more fairly implemented?

Your reductio ad absurdum about "predict(-ing) the future" is not worth much. I don't predict the future: I simply don't allow my toddler-age boys watch TV or play video games. I screen every movie they watch for appropriate content. That is how I control what my child is exposed to in the media.

Such an ad might appear in a game. However, the ad may never appear for reasons other than what you state. Working in profession closely related to the ad industry, I have to share with you that simply because an ad has been created does not mean it will be successful. Its success may or may not have any relation to any moral issue, but instead be determined by whether the advert has any leverage with the target audience.

Thus, your statement that without the existence of corporate morality it is simply a matter of economics is not without some merit, but the equation you create does not balance. There is more to the issue than just morality and money. I have a feeling we're hung up lacking common ground regarding terms and definitions.

I grant the artist a right to create such a work. Simultaneously, I state that I do not like it, nor do I think it is appropriate content for this website or the game. What about if we changed it from "Throw this boy off the cliff..." to "Throw this {insert stereotype here} off the cliff..."? It is still offensive. What about "Throw this cute lil ol bunny rabbit off the cliff..." It is still offensive because it is advocating violence without any redeeming factors.

If it said, "Save this boy from being hucked over the cliff: only $5" it might be a little, teeney-bit funny. Saving the innocent is a redeeming factor.

And with that, I'm done here. I can't believe I let myself get drawn into this... :shakehead:

[flyingfish32]

that aint really funny...

[seoulspirit]

sooo...how exactly would you respond to the lastest movie billboard then with nick cage?...wouldnt want your kids skulls lighting on fire and killing ppl :p :rofl:...

[Annhilator2142]

Mr bzb, you seem to have your own agenda here. I simply stated that once I had children my view of things like this phoney ad changed dramatically and now I see nothing amusing in it. I also stated that I was hostile towards folks promulgating such junk.

You however have challenged my parenting and my intellectual capacity. You also seem determined to shape this into some kind of rant against corporate morality.

Are we then to use personal morality--of which by definition each individual might have their own unique moral code? Or, would the common, accepted and standardized version of a society's moral code (corporate morality) be more fairly implemented?

Your reductio ad absurdum about "predict(-ing) the future" is not worth much. I don't predict the future: I simply don't allow my toddler-age boys watch TV or play video games. I screen every movie they watch for appropriate content. That is how I control what my child is exposed to in the media.

Such an ad might appear in a game. However, the ad may never appear for reasons other than what you state. Working in profession closely related to the ad industry, I have to share with you that simply because an ad has been created does not mean it will be successful. Its success may or may not have any relation to any moral issue, but instead be determined by whether the advert has any leverage with the target audience.

Thus, your statement that without the existence of corporate morality it is simply a matter of economics is not without some merit, but the equation you create does not balance. There is more to the issue than just morality and money. I have a feeling we're hung up lacking common ground regarding terms and definitions.

I grant the artist a right to create such a work. Simultaneously, I state that I do not like it, nor do I think it is appropriate content for this website or the game. What about if we changed it from "Throw this boy off the cliff..." to "Throw this {insert stereotype here} off the cliff..."? It is still offensive. What about "Throw this cute lil ol bunny rabbit off the cliff..." It is still offensive because it is advocating violence without any redeeming factors.

If it said, "Save this boy from being hucked over the cliff: only $5" it might be a little, teeney-bit funny. Saving the innocent is a redeeming factor.

And with that, I'm done here. I can't believe I let myself get drawn into this... :shakehead:


Money dont matter, so what about a million? I still say no guy

[UnsaintlyJesus]

thats kind of sick, throwing a kid,

wonder wat EA are thinking of :hmm:

but anyways, good find :)

6/10