View Full Version : radeon x1300pro 256mb or nvidia 6800 128mb?
FPS_Rich
02-22-2006, 01:46 AM
which one should i get a x1300pro 256 mb or a nvidia6800 128mb. im looking for a card that will run future games such as the soo to be coming quake wars i also want to run bf2 pretty smothly
imported_Jazza
02-22-2006, 02:00 AM
6800, try for 256MB but.
whoosh
02-22-2006, 02:03 AM
Before you buy anything from Nvidia. Go to thier website www.nivida.com and ask a question any question. Good luck.
There customer support sucks.
sackynut
02-22-2006, 02:50 AM
6800 is a better chip. and performs faster.
bloodie73
02-22-2006, 05:44 AM
6800 all the way, no questions asked.
ConscriptVirus
02-22-2006, 07:04 AM
this is actually kindof tough sortof...since bf2 is one of those large games, itll need more memory to store textures, so yea...try looking for a 6800 256mb
claevade
02-22-2006, 08:02 AM
The Radeon x1300 Pro has no chance against the Nvidia 6800 at all, I think even the x1600 Pro would fail.
redearedslider
02-22-2006, 12:49 PM
The Radeon x1300 Pro has no chance against the Nvidia 6800 at all, I think even the x1600 Pro would fail.
i love Ati, but the 6800 is just better... but for high end games you need 256 mb of vga ram
FLIPINOM4D
02-22-2006, 12:55 PM
6800 no questions asked, its just better than the ATI card
The OP needs to go google some benchmarks, making a poll will tell you nothing because too many people are ignorant to the facts and dont follow the industry close enough.
The 6800 can be thought of as an uber 6600GT for comparison and it is a great deal faster than the x1300. But dont rely on me, go actually read about this stuff, your poll might tell you a 6800 is better, but your not actually going to know why.
Robske007a
02-22-2006, 05:47 PM
I have compared the specs, the ATI x1300 has double the memory (you already know that) A lot of people chose nVidea because everyone is always against the winning force, look at microsoft? a lot of people say that windows s*cks but it doesn't...
For BF2 i strongly suggest the X1300
I have compared the specs, the ATI x1300 has double the memory (you already know that) A lot of people chose nVidea because everyone is always against the winning force, look at microsoft? a lot of people say that windows s*cks but it doesn't...
For BF2 i strongly suggest the X1300
I couldnt quickly google a x1300 pro vs 6800 but yeah... ummm
http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/12/02/vga_charts_viii/page12.html
There is a 256MB x1300 pro and a 256mb 6800. The difference in memory shouldnt help except at high resolutions with AA and AF
Darkstar10
02-22-2006, 06:35 PM
save a hundred more and buy a 7800 thats what i recommend. it is unbelievably fast and very beautiful
but if you are short in cash, id go with the 6800, the GS is new and cheaper
I have compared the specs, the ATI x1300 has double the memory (you already know that) A lot of people chose nVidea because everyone is always against the winning force, look at microsoft? a lot of people say that windows s*cks but it doesn't...
For BF2 i strongly suggest the X1300
Please man you have no idea what you are talking about so why do you suggest anything? a x1300 is not a gameing card and is not good for any game, doesn't matter how much memory it have
http://www.sweclockers.com/html/recension/rec_060221_xfx_6600_ddr2.php?page=6
there you can see how a x1300 perform against a 6600GT and a 6600GT perform about the same as a 6800. get some fact before you write stupid things next time ;)
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.