A review article

[machstem]

However a rather bias article, he does touch some good points and gives a quick review on the EuroForce booster pack.

http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/battlefield-2-euro-force/696620p2.html

PEACE

[imported_G.I.Jersey]

Thanks for the heads up. Was a good read.

[blackwindseminole]

Not sure about the biased part, sounds dead on to me.

[machstem]

As far as the bias goes, you can just tell he's got his "my game is ultimately bugged, but I'll review it anyway" aspect on the game, which is OK, but the pack should be given a clean review on its material, not on things we already know that BF2 is plagued with.

Good to see some of you enjoyed the article however.

PEACE

[Yonni]

As far as the bias goes, you can just tell he's got his "my game is ultimately bugged, but I'll review it anyway" aspect on the game, which is OK, but the pack should be given a clean review on its material, not on things we already know that BF2 is plagued with.
I disagree. You cannot seperate the two.

[machstem]

I disagree. You cannot seperate the two.

It is very possible to do so, as GameSpot has proven.

You can include the "fact" about the bugs in BF2 vanilla, but including it within your "cons" renders the article bias.

PEACE

[Yonni]

Do you have a link to the gamespot review? I can only find use reviews.

Anyway, we just disagree. I think disregarding the engine's bugs is unfair, since you cannot play Euro Forces itself, it's not a game. A reviewer can decide to only review the new additions, but I think it makes more sense to review the complete game, because that's what people will be playing.

[imported_Jammin]

here's another review http://www.gameslave.co.uk/content/battlefield-2-euro-force-review/

Personally i dont like EF myself, i dont feel like alot of thought was put into it